
The recent determination by the Chief Justice that there is no evidence to warrant the removal of the Electoral Commission Chair, her deputies, and the Special Prosecutor marks a significant moment in Ghana’s democratic development. This decision goes beyond a routine constitutional process; it stands as a powerful affirmation that independent institutions can function objectively under a well-structured administration that respects democratic principles.
At the heart of every thriving democracy is the independence of its institutions. When the judiciary, electoral bodies, and accountability offices are allowed to operate without interference, democracy becomes stronger, more credible, and more stable. The Chief Justice’s careful examination of the petitions and his conclusion that no sufficient evidence exists demonstrate that due process remains the guiding principle of our constitutional order.
Under the new administration, we are witnessing encouraging signs that governance is being anchored in the rule of law rather than political convenience. The Chief Justice’s decision reinforces the idea that constitutional officers cannot be removed based on speculation, pressure, or partisan expectations. Evidence, procedure, and constitutional standards must guide such actions, and in this case, they clearly did.
It is important to recall that before his appointment, sections of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), now in opposition, cast doubt on his independence and integrity. Narratives were advanced suggesting that he would be politically aligned or influenced. However, this recent development has shown otherwise. The Chief Justice has demonstrated professionalism, impartiality, and fidelity to the Constitution.
By declining to recommend removal in the absence of evidence, he has strengthened public confidence in the judiciary and affirmed that the courts are not extensions of political power. His conduct serves as a clear rebuttal to earlier criticisms and proves that Ghana’s institutions are guided by law, not political propaganda.
This moment should be applauded as a strong indication that the system is working. The Electoral Commission and the Office of the Special Prosecutor are sensitive institutions whose independence must be protected. The fact that the constitutional process was followed thoroughly and objectively reflects a governance environment that understands and respects democratic boundaries.
Democracy is not tested when institutions agree with political actors; it is tested when they act independently, even in politically sensitive matters. The Chief Justice’s decision sends a reassuring message that Ghana’s constitutional safeguards remain intact.
The new administration deserves commendation for fostering an atmosphere where institutions are empowered to operate within the law, free from undue pressure. When the executive respects institutional autonomy and the judiciary upholds constitutional standards, democracy flourishes.
This is more than a legal determination, it is a democratic milestone. It signals that Ghana’s constitutional architecture is resilient and that independent institutions can indeed work independently under responsible and structured leadership.
Gallant Cadres of NDC
Comrade Richard E A Sarpong, Father Casford. The PRO, 0208573712
Ohemaa Akosua Borngreat, Deputy PRO, 0243179445
Mr F Kadan, Secretary, 0242276044
Mr Eric Takyi, Deputy Secretary, 0546572070
Mr Lawrence Odoom, Vice Chair, 0272626466
Source By The Gallant Cadres of NDC
Comments are closed.